ursula: second-century Roman glass die (icosahedron)
Ursula ([personal profile] ursula) wrote 2019-04-12 11:54 am (UTC)

I feel a little guilty in the sense that when I'm doing popular-math stuff I usually spend a lot more time talking about what string theory is to begin with and a lot less time talking about Hodge diamonds, but chatting with people who actually knew some geometry was seductive.

Evelyn made the transcript! I know because she emailed me to ask what word I was saying for "Fermats".

Complex analysis is so much prettier than real analysis. Everything just works and it's beautiful, plus you get a handful of ridiculous tricks for solving integrals as a bonus. (I took every first-year sequence my graduate program had except for real analysis, which means I know a surprising amount of geometry and functional analysis for someone who's officially an algebraist, but only the tiniest bit of undergrad measure theory.)

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org