I feel a little guilty in the sense that when I'm doing popular-math stuff I usually spend a lot more time talking about what string theory is to begin with and a lot less time talking about Hodge diamonds, but chatting with people who actually knew some geometry was seductive.
Evelyn made the transcript! I know because she emailed me to ask what word I was saying for "Fermats".
Complex analysis is so much prettier than real analysis. Everything just works and it's beautiful, plus you get a handful of ridiculous tricks for solving integrals as a bonus. (I took every first-year sequence my graduate program had except for real analysis, which means I know a surprising amount of geometry and functional analysis for someone who's officially an algebraist, but only the tiniest bit of undergrad measure theory.)
Everyone tells me that about complex analysis! I made a brief attempt to pick it up on my own with Tristan Needham's (non-rigorous) Visual Complex Analysis a few years back, but then my copy drowned and I gave up. :] I really wish I'd taken it in undergrad, but it's probably too late.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Evelyn made the transcript! I know because she emailed me to ask what word I was saying for "Fermats".
Complex analysis is so much prettier than real analysis. Everything just works and it's beautiful, plus you get a handful of ridiculous tricks for solving integrals as a bonus. (I took every first-year sequence my graduate program had except for real analysis, which means I know a surprising amount of geometry and functional analysis for someone who's officially an algebraist, but only the tiniest bit of undergrad measure theory.)
no subject