I read it and liked it a lot. As you note, the criticisms are accurate, but it's still a good book, and i felt there was a lot in there that should have been obvious to me, but that i hadn't thought about. And, if i hadn't, i hadn't, and now i have, so go Michael Pollan, i guess. This is not a very coherent argument.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-19 11:16 pm (UTC)